Legal Opinion
Spencer v. Moore
District Court, E.D. Missouri
Decided July 18, 1986No. 86-363C(1)PublishedCited by 104 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
638 F.Supp. 315 (1986)
Randy G. SPENCER, Plaintiff,
v.
Dick MOORE, et al., Defendants.
No. 86-363C(1).
United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, E.D.
July 18, 1986.
Randy G. Spencer, pro se.
Rosalynn Van Heest, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, Mo., for defendants Moore, Bolin, Wyrick, Trickey, and Long.
ORDER AND MEMORANDUM
NANGLE, Chief Judge.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion of defendants to dismiss plaintiff's amended complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted be and is granted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to join an additional party as a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Azeez v. DeRobertisDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1982
- Louis Wolfish v. Honorable Edward LeviCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- United States Ex Rel. Wolfish v. LeviDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by104 opinions
- Robert D. Sprouse v. David Babcock, Charles Harper and Ronald G. WelderCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
- Cox v. JacksonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2008
- Rienholtz v. CampbellDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1999
- Hoover v. WatsonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1995
- Ishaaq v. ComptonDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1995
99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.