Joseph E. Lay Co. v. Mendenhall
Indiana Supreme Court
From Randolph Circuit Court; James 8. Engle, Judge. Action by James F. Mendenhall against The Joseph E. Lay Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtFelt, J.
This is a suit for damages for personal injuries brought by the appellee against the appellant. The complaint was in one paragraph and was answered by general denial. The appellant assigns as error that: (1) the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action; (2) error in overruling the motion for judgment on the answers to the interrogatories notwithstanding the general verdict; (3) overruling appellant’s motion for a new trial.
1. Appellee contends that appellant has not complied with the rules of this court in the preparation of its briefs. While the briefs are…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Green v. American Car & Foundry Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1904
- Indianapolis Southern Railroad v. WallIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
- F. Bimel Co. v. HarterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
- American Car & Foundry Co. v. VanceIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
- Scott v. Town of FremontIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
3Cited by8 opinions
- Boes v. Grand Rapids & Indiana RailroadIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
- Evansville Furniture Co. v. FreemanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
- Standard Forgings Co. v. HolmstromIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
- Town of Newpoint v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1915
- Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. W. H. McIntyre Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1915
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.