Legal Opinion

Miller v. Ellis

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 31, 2002No. A095705PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McGUINESS, P. J.

Mitchell D. Ellis appeals from a judgment in favor of respondent Lawrence D. Miller on Miller’s action for equitable indemnity. The action arises from a previous personal injury lawsuit and ensuing malpractice action by the personal injury plaintiff against Attorneys Ellis, Miller, and Joseph Pisano for failing to bring the underlying case to trial within five years. Ellis contends the trial court erred as a matter of law in applying the collateral source rule to this action, in which one of two cotortfeasors (Miller) is seeking equitable indemnification from the other…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. American Motorcycle Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Maryland Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. Helfend v. Southern California Rapid Transit DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Western Steamship Lines, Inc. v. San Pedro Peninsula HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Board of Education v. Jack M.California Supreme Court · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Amerigas Propane, L.P. v. Landstar Ranger, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2010
  2. Allied Waste North America, Inc. v. Lewis, King, Krieg & Waldrop, P.C.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2015
  3. Hoa v. RileyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2015
  4. Sullins v. Exxon Mobil Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2010
  5. Century-National Insurance Co. v. Global Hawk InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API