Legal Opinion

CWIK v. Giannoulias

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 2010No. 108313PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Karmeier

Chief Justice Fitzgerald and Justices Freeman, Thomas, Kilbride, Garman, and Burke concurred in the judgment and opinion.

OPINION

In this appeal, plaintiffs challenge the state’s retention of interest earned on property held by the state pursuant to section 15 of the Uniform Disposition of Unclaimed Property Act (765 ILCS 1025/15 (West 2004)). In proceedings below, the circuit court of Cook County denied the defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ amended complaint, which sought recovery of interest on plaintiffs property (money) previously held by the state under the Act; however, the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Texaco, Inc. v. ShortSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Brown v. Legal Foundation of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Napleton v. Village of HinsdaleIllinois Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Canel v. TopinkaIllinois Supreme Court · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Rowe v. RaoulIllinois Supreme Court · 2023
  2. Kanerva v. WeemsIllinois Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Kolton v. FrerichsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
  4. Muskin v. State Department of Assessments & TaxationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  5. Katherine Cerajeski v. Greg ZoellerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API