Merchants National Bank v. Adams

This is an action in assumpsit to recover for sums allegedly due on a “Master Charge” credit card. A hearing before the district court resulted in a verdict for the defendant. After the trial, the plaintiff’s motion to set áside the verdict “as being contrary to the evidence” was denied subject to exception. Some twenty-eight days after the evidence was closed, the plaintiff requested the court for specific findings of fact and rulings of law. This too was denied, and the plaintiff excepted. However, the court of its own motion did make certain findings and rulings. All questions of law…