Legal Opinion

Thiem v. Thomas

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided August 17, 1979No. 78-293PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrock, J.

The question before us is whether certain language in a well-drilling contract can be construed as a guarantee that the contractor will establish a water-producing well as a condition precedent to receiving payment for his services.

The plaintiff, a well-drilling contractor, brought this action to recover the contract price for drilling a well hole on the defendant’s land. The defendant claims that he has no obligation to compensate the plaintiff because the well hole did not produce water. Trial to the court resulted in a verdict for the defendant. The plaintiff moved to set aside the verdict…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Griswold v. Heat CorporationSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1967
  2. MacLeod v. Chalet Susse International, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
  3. Aldrich v. Charles Beauregard & SonsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1964
  4. Beaudoin v. BeaudoinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  5. Bellak v. Franconia CollegeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Gamble v. University SystemSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
  2. Mills v. Nashua Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
  3. Merrimack School District v. National School Bus Service, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
  4. Appeal of Concerned Corporators of the Portsmouth Savings BankSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
  5. R. Zoppo Co. v. City of DoverSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API