Hill v. State
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtBlandin, J.
The only question transferred is whether the amendment filed on March 3, 1961 to the plaintiff’s appeal taken on August 7, 1959, may be allowed under RSA 233:17. The Trial Court found after a hearing that “justice requires that the amendment be allowed, particularly in the absence of any evidence that the State’s position has been changed as a result of any delay, and will allow the amendment, unless as a matter of law it may not properly be allowed.”
The following facts were also found by the Court with the agreement of counsel:
The condemnation proceedings were begun on March 10, 1958, in…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Menge v. City of ManchesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
- Merchants National Bank v. AdamsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974