Legal Opinion
Six Cherry Hill, Inc. v. Township of Cherry Hill
New Jersey Tax Court
Decided December 13, 1984PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIMM, J.T.C.
These local property tax assessment matters involve a claim that the existing use of the subject properties as a high-rise apartment complex which is subject to rent control is not the highest and best use for the land. Taxpayers contend that *123office use is the highest and best use. The subject properties are two contiguous lots each with a twelve-story apartment building together known as the Cherry Hill apartments. The “East Building,” known as 2151 Route 38, is owned by Six Cherry Hill, Inc., and is designated as Block 285, Lot 2B. For the tax year 1982 the assessment was:
Land $…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Southern Burlington County N.A.A.C.P. v. Township of Mount LaurelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
- Southern Burlington County N.A.A.C.P. v. Township of Mount LaurelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
- Mathews v. CintronSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Aetna Life Insurance Co. v. City of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Samuel Hird & Sons, Inc. v. City of GarfieldNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- In Re AWB Associates, G.P.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
- County of Monmouth v. HiltonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
- Miele v. Township of JacksonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
- Mocco v. City of Jersey City (In Re Mocco)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- Six Cherry Hill, Inc. v. Township of Cherry HillNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.