Six Cherry Hill, Inc. v. Township of Cherry Hill

The judgment of the Tax Court is affirmed essentially for the reasons set forth by Judge Rimm in his opinion reported at 7 N.J.Tax 120 (Tax Ct.1984).

As to the contention that the trial judge should have fixed his own valuation, Glen Wall Associates v. Wall Tp., 99 N.J. 265, 280, 491 A.2d 1247 (1985), Judge Rimm concluded that he did not have sufficient evidence to find a different valuation from the assessments under appeal. 7 N.J.Tax at 134. He noted that plaintiffs should have presented “evidence to the court of the value of the buildings if substantially rehabilitated with the *335cost of…