Legal Opinion
United States v. Archer-Daniels-Midland Co.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 22, 2003No. CIV.A.02-1768 JDBPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BATES, District Judge.
The United States of America (the “government”) brings this case against Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (“ADM”) and Minnesota Corn Processors, LLC (“MCP”) for antitrust violations arising out of the merger of those two companies. The government alleges that the transaction would substantially lessen competition in the highly concentrated markets for corn syrup and high fructose corn syrup (“HFCS”). Presently before the Court is the government’s motion for entry of a proposed Final Judgment agreed upon by the parties. For the reasons stated below, the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re High Fructose Corn Syrup Antitrust Litigation. Appeal of a & W Bottling, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Microsoft Corporation. United States of America v. Microsoft CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- United States v. BNS Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Massachusetts School of Law at Andover, Inc., Proposed Intervenor v. United States of America, American Bar AssociationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Western Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. At&t Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- United States v. US Airways Group, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Gurvey v. Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman PCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
- United States of America v. Deutsche Telekom AgDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
- United States of America v. Deutsche Telekom AgDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.