Legal Opinion

People v. Hanaw

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 26, 1895PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to Lenawee; Lane, J. Assumpsit by the people against Joseph Hanaw and John Kerr on a recognizance. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants bring error. Modified and affirmed.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

This was an action on a recognizance entered into in open court in a. proceeding pending against one Joseph Gregory upon an information which charged against Gregory the offense of feloniously breaking and entering, in the night-time, a shop not adjoining to or occupied with a dwelling house, with intent to commit larceny, and, in a second count of the information, the offense of larceny. The condition of the recognizance was as follows:

“If the said Joseph Gregory doth well and truly appear at the next term of this court, and answer to an information on file against him for burglary, and not…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Daniels v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Gildersleeve v. PeopleNew York Supreme Court · 1850
  3. Cole v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Fraser v. LittleMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
  5. People v. RutanMichigan Supreme Court · 1853

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. Morgan.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  2. County of Oakland v. Central West Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Knight v. State Ex Rel. HenrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. People v. . ParisiNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  5. State v. CooperSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API