Legal Opinion

United States v. Paul Panczko

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided October 19, 1966No. 15519_1PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHNACKENBERG, Circuit Judge.

Paul Panczko, defendant, appeals from a judgment of the district court convicting him on both counts of an indictment, which in count I charged him and Guy Mendola (who died before the return of the indictment), Paul Vincent Lacinak, Robert E. Connors and Granville Lee Turner, with a conspiracy to pass and sell certain counterfeit United States federal reserve notes. Trial was by jury. Several overt acts were alleged and reliance was placed on Title 18 United States Code § 371.

Panczko was charged in count II with a violation of § 473; 18 U.S.C. in that he did…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. EwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Beavers v. HaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. Howard Ross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
  4. Allen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1924
  5. Sterling H. Nickens v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  3. United States v. George Deloney and Harriet DeloneyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1968
  4. United States v. Irving NapueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
  5. United States v. Eleanor LeeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API