Legal Opinion

Lundy v. Delmas

California Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1894No. 15556PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Clara County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

The Court.

The plaintiffs brought this action against the defendants, who are sixteen of the regents of the University of California, to recover damages against them, in their individual capacity, for the death of Daniel Lundy, plaintiffs’ father.

It is alleged in the complaint: “ That on and for a long time prior to the sixteenth day of November, 1891, each and all of said defendants were, and from thence hitherto have been and yet are, the regents of the University of California, and during all of said time were acting as such, and exercised the duties and assumed the obligations of such…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Greene v. MayorNew York Court of Appeals · 1875

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Caminetti v. Pac. Mut. Life Ins. Co. of Cal.California Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Regents of University of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Newmarker v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. Davie v. Board of Regents, University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  5. State ex rel. Kendall v. ColeNevada Supreme Court · 1915

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API