Legal Opinion

Oxenham v. Mitchell

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 15, 1931No. [No. 75, October Term, 1930.]PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParke, J.

Many years ago James A. Oxenham was the owner of a tract of land called “Asbury,” containing 317 acres, in .Talbot County, and he desired to borrow $3,500 of William M. Poisal. He offered the land to secure the loan, but. Poisal ■demanded the usurious rate of eight per centum, and the loan and the lien to be put in a form which would at once conceal the usury and preserve the essential features of a mortgage deed. So a scheme was devised and was executed. On December 21st, 1877, Oxenham and wife conveyed the tract of land to Poisal in fee simple; and simultaneously Poisal granted the same…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Booth v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1881
  2. Washington Fire Insurance v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1870
  3. George's Creek Coal & Iron Co. v. County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1883
  4. Prince De Bearn v. WinansCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1909
  5. Orem v. WrightsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1879

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Rapley v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  2. Bourgeois v. Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  3. Thomas v. KlemmCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1945
  4. Kiser v. LucasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1936
  5. Hoover v. HooverSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API