Legal Opinion

Rappaport v. Payne

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 18, 1934No. Civ. No. 9759PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARCHBALD, J., pro tem.

Petitioner worked as court reporter in department 24 of the Superior Court of Los An-geles County on the twentieth and twenty-first days of December, 1932. The clerk of said court certified that such services were rendered and the judge presiding in the department made his certificate of the fact that they were rendered under his order and were a just and legal charge against the county, and ordered the county auditor to draw his warrant on the treasurer in payment thereof. The amount of each order was $15. Demand was made by petitioner for the issuance of such warrants,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Millholen v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Lorraine v. McCombCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. CastelloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. Webster County Board of Supervisors v. FlatterySupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
  3. McNeil v. Board of RetirementCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Corona Foothill Lemon Co. v. LillibridgeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  5. Burd v. Barkley Court Reporters, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API