Legal Opinion

McNeil v. Board of Retirement

California Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1958No. Sac. 6738PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Robert D. Carter and Ralph M. Brown, for Respondents.

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.

Defendants appeal from a judgment in an action brought by plaintiffs, official court reporters of the superior court of Stanislaus County, for a declaration of their rights under the County Employees Retirement Law of 1937. (Gov. Code, § 31450 et seq.)

The amount of plaintiffs’ pensions on retirement will depend on the amounts of their normal and additional contributions to the retirement system. (Gov. Code, §§ 31627, 31673, 31675.) The county must contribute to the retirement system an amount equal to the reporters’ accumulated normal contributions. Thus the more plaintiffs are permitted to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. County of Los Angeles v. FrisbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Farrell v. County of PlacerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Boren v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Sobey v. MolonyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  5. County of San Diego v. MilotzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. City of Long Beach v. MansellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Longshore v. County of VenturaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Crumpler v. Board of AdministrationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  4. Petri Cleaners, Inc. v. Automotive Employees, Laundry Drivers & Helpers Local No. 88California Supreme Court · 1960
  5. California Cigarette Concessions, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API