Legal Opinion
State v. Barker
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided August 30, 2000No. 71A03-0001-CR-4PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATTINGLY, Judge
The State appeals the trial court’s grant of defendant Janice Barker’s motion to suppress evidence. The State raises one issue on appeal, which we restate as whether the trial court erred by granting the motion to suppress. 1
We affirm.
FACTS & PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On December 17, 1998, South Bend Police Officer James Walsh received an anonymous tip that sixty-one year-old Janice Barker was growing marijuana in her home. Officer Walsh, joined by Officer Michael Critchlow, went to Barker’s residence that evening. They were out of uniform and driving an unmarked vehicle. The…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Minnesota v. DickersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Jones v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
- Snyder v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hirshey v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- Porter v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- State v. BarkerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Christopher Dent v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2016
- Jeffrey Dean Needler v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.