Snyder v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CHEZEM, Judge.
Case Summary
Defendant, Snyder, appeals his conviction for Operating a Vehicle While Intoxicated. We affirm.
Issues
I. Whether a roadblock is an unreasonable seizure which violates the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution when the driver has not consented but was either unable to avoid the roadblock or deemed seized because he came within a reasonable distance of the roadblock.
II. Whether the act of a driver making a turn away from a sobriety roadblock is a specific and articulable fact which would allow a police officer to draw an inference sufficient…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Murphy v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1989
- Ackerman v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- State v. TalbotCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990
- State v. FriedelIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- Hirshey v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.