Landsiedel v. Director, North Dakota Department of Transportation
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KAPSNER, Justice.
[¶ 1] Darren Landsiedel and Jentry Neu separately appealed district court judgments upholding the decisions of the Department of Transportation to suspend their driving privileges for alcohol-related offenses. The Department held telephonic hearings in both cases, to which Landsie-del and Neu objected. We consolidated their appeals to determine whether N.D.C.C. § 39-20-05 permits the Department to conduct telephonic hearings regarding alcohol-related offenses under N.D.C.C. ch. 39-20. We hold the Department failed to conduct these administrative hearings in accordance with…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Agnew v. HjelleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
- Kobilansky v. LiffrigNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- Feland v. P.F.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Kiecker v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Huff v. NORTH DAKOTA STATE BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS-INVESTIGATIVE PANEL BNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Crandall v. CrandallNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Schock v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- Berger v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Holbach v. City of MinotNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- Willits v. Job Service of North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.