Legal Opinion

Landsiedel v. Director, North Dakota Department of Transportation

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 2009No. Nos. 20090056, 20090057PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Darren Landsiedel and Jentry Neu separately appealed district court judgments upholding the decisions of the Department of Transportation to suspend their driving privileges for alcohol-related offenses. The Department held telephonic hearings in both cases, to which Landsie-del and Neu objected. We consolidated their appeals to determine whether N.D.C.C. § 39-20-05 permits the Department to conduct telephonic hearings regarding alcohol-related offenses under N.D.C.C. ch. 39-20. We hold the Department failed to conduct these administrative hearings in accordance with…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Agnew v. HjelleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Kobilansky v. LiffrigNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Feland v. P.F.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Kiecker v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Huff v. NORTH DAKOTA STATE BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS-INVESTIGATIVE PANEL BNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Crandall v. CrandallNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Schock v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Berger v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Holbach v. City of MinotNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Willits v. Job Service of North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API