Schock v. North Dakota Department of Transportation
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SANDSTROM, Justice.
[¶ 1] Paul Schock appeals from a district court judgment affirming an administrative order suspending his driver’s license for 180 days for driving a vehicle under the influence of intoxicating liquor. We affirm the judgment, concluding a reasoning mind reasonably could have concluded Schock provided a breath sample within two hours of driving a motor vehicle. We decline to grant his request for attorney’s fees and costs under N.D.C.C. § 28-82-50.
I
[¶ 2] On March 13, 2011, a Beulah police officer stopped Schock for a traffic violation at 12:54 a.m. The officer smelled an…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- State v. SteffesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- Schwind v. Director, North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Madison v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- Aamodt v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Dettler v. SprynczynatykNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Pesanti v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Fossum v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- Haynes v. Director, Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- Dawson v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Matter of Emelia Hirsch TrustNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.