State v. Mark
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Lavine, Beach and Keller, Js. *
LAVINE J.
*243 The state appeals from the judgment of the trial court 1 setting aside the jury's verdict finding the defendant, Michael Mark, guilty of one count of tampering with evidence in violation of General Statutes (Rev. to 2010) § 53a-155 (a). 2 The state claims that the evidence was sufficient to support the jury's verdict of guilty. We agree with the state and reverse the judgment of the trial court.
A jury reasonably could have found the following facts. In the early morning of November 2, 2010, the victim, Arnaldo Gonzalez was walking to a polling station…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. CariSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- State v. AvcollieSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- State v. OttoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
- State v. GriffinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- State v. ForeshawSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. MartinezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
- State v. LamantiaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2020
- State v. MarkConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
- State v. BoldenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2025
- State v. KnoxConnecticut Appellate Court · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.