Legal Opinion

State v. Mark

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided January 17, 2017No. AC38567PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lavine, Beach and Keller, Js. *

LAVINE J.

*243 The state appeals from the judgment of the trial court 1 setting aside the jury's verdict finding the defendant, Michael Mark, guilty of one count of tampering with evidence in violation of General Statutes (Rev. to 2010) § 53a-155 (a). 2 The state claims that the evidence was sufficient to support the jury's verdict of guilty. We agree with the state and reverse the judgment of the trial court.

A jury reasonably could have found the following facts. In the early morning of November 2, 2010, the victim, Arnaldo Gonzalez was walking to a polling station…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. CariSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  2. State v. AvcollieSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  3. State v. OttoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
  4. State v. GriffinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  5. State v. ForeshawSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. MartinezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
  2. State v. LamantiaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2020
  3. State v. MarkConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
  4. State v. BoldenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2025
  5. State v. KnoxConnecticut Appellate Court · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API