Legal Opinion
Floyd v. Saber Fitness Hegenberger, LLC
District Court, N.D. California
Decided July 31, 2025No. 3:24-cv-01278Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 MICHAEL DEVIN FLOYD, Case No. 24-cv-01278-TSH 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 9 v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY 10 SABER FITNESS HEGENBERGER, LLC, JUDGMENT 11 Defendant. Re: Dkt. No. 109 12 13 I. INTRODUCTION 14 Plaintiff Michael Devin Floyd, proceeding pro se, filed a complaint for civil rights 15 violations and contract claims against Saber Fitness Hegenberger, LLC (“Saber”), alleging that 16 Saber improperly terminated Floyd’s gym membership. ECF No. 52 (Third Amended Complaint). 17 Pending…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Cafasso v. General Dynamics C4 Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Robin Orr v. Bank of America, Nt & SaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
- Kearns v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.