Legal Opinion

E.H. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Division of Family & Youth Services

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 2001No. S-9532PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRYNER, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

In 1996 the superior court granted the Department of Health and Social Services (the department) temporary custody of E.H.'s two sons, J.J.H. and J.M.H. The court adjudicated the boys children in need of aid (CINA) in 1997. In 1999 the department successfully petitioned for termination of E.H.'s parental rights. EH. repeatedly moved for dismissal for lack of jurisdiction and argued that her children were not properly before Alaska courts. E.H. claims that the superior court erred by denying her motions to dismiss. Because the record demonstrates that the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Langdon v. ChampionAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  2. D.M. v. State, Division of Family & Youth ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
  3. N.A. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
  4. R.J.M. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  5. E.M. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Division of Family & Youth ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. S.B. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Division of Family & Youth ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Melgar v. CampoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  3. Steven D. v. Nicole J.Alaska Supreme Court · 2013
  4. P.M. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Division of Family & Youth ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Norman S. v. State of Alaska, DHSS, OCSAlaska Supreme Court · 2020

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API