Felix Amador v. State

OPINION

MARTHA HILL JAMISON, Justice.

A jury convicted appellant Felix Amador of aggravated robbery and assessed his punishment at eighteen years’ imprisonment. In his first two issues on appeal, appellant contends that the trial court erred in permitting a police officer to testify regarding complainant’s out of court statements because such testimony violated the right to confront -witnesses and constituted inadmissible hearsay. In his third issue, appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict. We affirm.

Background

According to their testimony at trial, Ruth and…