State v. White
Supreme Court of Vermont
Ineormation for larceny. Plea, not guilty. Trial by jury at the June Term, 1904, Orange County, Rowell, J., presiding. Verdict, guilty; and judgment thereon. The respondent excepted. The opinion states the case. The offered declaration of respondent was admissible. 24 A. & E. Enc. (2 Ed.) 662; Rob. Dig. 285 § 195; Rudd v. Rounds, 64 Vt. 432; 18 A. & E Enc. (2 Ed.) 509; Com. v. Rubin, 163 Mass. 453; Danforth v. Streeter, 28 Vt. 490; Reg. v. Abraham, 2 C. & K. 330.
1Opinion of the CourtPowers, J.
The respondent was convicted of the larceny of a team which he had hired at Eairlee, Vt., and which he left at Franklin, N. H., after he had used it a part of the time covered by the contract of bailment. The State claimed that he obtained possession of the property with *242felonious intent; this the respondent denied, and he claimed that the hiring and use of the team were bona fide. The respondent offered to- show that while the property was in his possession at Hill, N. H., and before he knew that any suspicion attached to him or that any search had been instituted, he stated that the team…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Vermont · 1900
- State v. DaleySupreme Court of Vermont · 1881
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
- State v. PettisSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1873
- State v. TottenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1899
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ex Parte BeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- State v. GoldstrohmWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1919
- State v. LivermoreMontana Supreme Court · 1921
- State v. BakerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1919
- State v. KamudaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1925
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.