Legal Opinion

State v. Fitzgerald

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided March 3, 1900PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Indictment for burglary including larceny. Bennington County, June Term, 1899, Munson, J.,. presiding. Trial by jury. Verdict, guilty. Judgment on verdict. The respondent excepted. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtWatson, J.

The respondent was indicted and tried for burglarizing the store of Frank Huling, and for the larceny of seventeen watches therein being, of the property of Huling. Huling was a witness in behalf of the State, and testified in substance, that some of these watches were old ones for which he had traded, and some of them were new ones purchased by him of Bogle Brothers of White Jtiver Junction, and that when he purchased them, he received from Bogle Brothers, bills with the numbers of the watches purchased thereon, which he after-wards compared with the numbers on the watches and found to be…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. WardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1888
  2. Bovee v. Town of DanvilleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1880
  3. Smith v. Niagara Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1887
  4. Commonwealth v. McGortyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  5. Wafford v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1876

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. SearleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
  2. Ide v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1909
  3. MacDonald, B.N.F. v. OrtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1926
  4. State v. GoldstrohmWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1919
  5. State v. Foss.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1926

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API