Legal Opinion

State v. Baker

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1919PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error to Circuit Court, Wood County. Monroe H. Baker and Burns Cottrill were jointly indicted for buying and receiving stolen goods, and defendant Baker 'was tried separately and convicted, and be brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Williams, Judge:

Defendant and one Burns Cottrill were jointly indicted 'for buying and receiving from William Gilman and Wilbert Peebles stolen goods, the property of the Germania Club, a corporation, knowing them to be stolen. Defendant was tried •separately, convicted and sentenced to five years imprisonment in the penitentiary, and he brings error.

He assigns as error the admission of declarations made by third parties, not in his presence. This relates to eonversa-"tions which occurred between Gilmpn and Peebles, the two ! principal prosecuting witnesses, and Burns Cottrill concerning the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. CainWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1882
  2. State v. PraterWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Slaughter v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  4. Graff v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  5. First National Bank of Pennsboro v. BarkerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1914

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. PainterWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Witters v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
  3. State v. FilesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Burk v. Huntington Development & Gas Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1950
  5. State v. StaceyOregon Supreme Court · 1936

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API