Legal Opinion

State v. Preuss

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 31, 1944No. 33,690PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Magney, Justice.

Defendant operates a beer tavern in the village of Perham, Otter Tail county, this state. Plaintiff brought this action to abate defendant’s place of business as a public nuisance. It was abated, and defendant appeals from the order denying his motion for a new trial.

Otter Tail county is a dry county. No license can be issued therein to any individual for the sale of intoxicating liquor. Villages, however, have authority under the state law to operate on sale and off sale liquor stores. The village of Perham opened up an off sale liquor store in December 1939 and an on sale…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Wilcox v. RyderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  2. Uhlenhopp v. SteegeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  3. Ristow v. Von BergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Miller v. Minneapolis Underwriters Assn. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  2. State v. Red Owl Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  3. Bangor Baptist Church v. State of Me., Dept. of Educ.District Court, D. Maine · 1983
  4. State v. Red Owl Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  5. State v. Red Owl Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API