Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Red Owl Stores, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 25, 1958No. 37,322Published

1DissentDell, Chief Justice

Conceding that a trial court may not act arbitrarily and without limitations in the matter of granting or denying injunctions,11 *253it is nevertheless well settled that the allowance or disallowance of injunctive relief rests largely within judicial discretion.12 “If upon the facts the trial court could reasonably have found either way, * * * [this court is] not at liberty to interfere.”13 When this case came before the trial court it was first called upon to determine whether or not, from a procedural standpoint, an injunction was the appropriate remedy. It decided this issue in the negative…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Fitchette v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  2. State v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  3. State v. HovorkaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  4. Bankers Reserve Life Co. v. OmbersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  5. Higgins v. LacroixSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API