Legal Opinion

Gleitsmann v. Gleitsmann

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1901PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, Joseph Wilhelm Gleitsmann, from an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 29th day of January, 1901, upon the decision ■ of the court, rendered after a trial at the New York Special Term, overruling said defendant’s demurrer to the complaint.

1Opinion of the Court

The following is the opinion of Lawrence, J., delivered at Special Term :

Lawrence, J.:

The complaint in this suit prays for the appointment of a trustee of the trust created by a certain indenture of marriage settlement attached to and forming part of said complaint, and, incidental to such appointment, that an accounting be had between the parties who now hold the trust property and the trustees so appointed. It is alleged that on or about the 21st day of October, 1871, at Wiesbaden, in the State of Hesse-Nassau, German Empire, the plaintiff and defendant Joseph Wilhelm Gleitsmann agreed to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rochester Railway Co. v. RobinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Wertheim v. ClergueAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  3. Barclay v. Quicksilver Mining Co.New York Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Phinney v. PhinneyNew York Supreme Court · 1859
  5. Reading v. HagginNew York Supreme Court · 1890

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chesny v. ChesnyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
  2. Williamson v. WagerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  3. Swing v. WanamakerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API