Phinney v. Phinney
New York Supreme Court
Demurrers to complaint. The facts will sufficiently appear in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Roosevelt, Justice.
Although the new Code has abolished all the ancient forms of pleading, it has not abolished the necessity of written specifications, in advance of the trial, of each party’s claim or defence. (§ 140.) These specifications, too, are required to be “ definite and certain,” so as to enable the court, as well as the adverse party, to see clearly the “ precise nature ” of the case intended to be made. (§ 160.) The complaint, in particular, must contain “a plain and concise statement of the facts constituting the cause of action, without unnecessary repetition.” And without…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Bank of Commerce v. FuquaMontana Supreme Court · 1891
- Morton ex rel. Richardson v. Supreme Council of the Royal LeagueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1903
- Wabash Railroad Co. v. HassettIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
- Musser v. MusserSupreme Court of Missouri · 1920
- Savannah, Florida & Western Railway Co. v. EvansSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.