Legal Opinion

Nevers v. Killinger

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided December 30, 1997No. 2:97-cv-75175PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ZATKOFF, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter is before the Court on Petitioner’s Request for a Writ of Habeas Corpus. Respondent filed a response, and Petitioner has elected not to reply. On December 22, 1997, a hearing was held at which the Court heard oral argument from both parties. For the reasons set forth below, Petitioner’s Request for a Writ of Habeas Corpus is granted.

II. BACKGROUND

The facts of this case have been recounted numerous times and need not be repeated in their entirety. Therefore, only a brief overview of pertinent facts is required for…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Larry Nevers v. George Killinger, Warden of Fmc Fort Worth, Forth Worth, Texas, Kenneth McGinnis Michigan Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  2. Bowling v. ParkerDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2001
  3. Sellan v. KuhlmanDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1999
  4. Hence v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1999
  5. Jones v. JonesDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API