Legal Opinion
Schultz v. Frisby
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided October 7, 1985No. Civ. A. 85-C-1018PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
REYNOLDS, Chief Judge.
This is an action to enjoin the enforcement of an anti-picketing ordinance.
Plaintiffs Sandra C. Schultz and Robert C. Braun filed a complaint on July 2, 1985, under § 1983 of Title 42 U.S.C., seeking declaratory, preliminary, and permanent in-junctive relief from an alleged deprivation of their rights under the First and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution. Defendants in the action are Russell Frisby and George Hunt, Supervisors of the Town Board of Brookfield, Wisconsin; Robert Wargowski, Chairman of the Town Board; Harlan Ross,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. GraceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Carey v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Martin v. City of StruthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Frisby v. SchultzSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Brenda Curtis v. James R. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- E. Stephen Dean v. Thomas K. ByerleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Sandra C. Schultz and Robert C. Braun v. Russell Frisby, George R. Hunt, Robert Wargowski, Harlan Ross, Clayton A. Cramer, and the Town of BrookfieldCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Sandra C. Schultz and Robert C. Braun v. Russell FrisbyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.