Legal Opinion

Sandra C. Schultz and Robert C. Braun v. Russell Frisby

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 27, 1989No. 89-1095PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge.

The Town of Brookfield, Wisconsin, has an ordinance curtailing picketing in residential areas. Relying on the assurance of the Town’s counsel that this ordinance prohibits only picketing “directed at a single residence”, the Supreme Court held that the ban satisfies the first amendment. Frisby v. Schultz, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 2495, 2501, 101 L.Ed.2d 420 (1988). After receiving the Court’s judgment, we returned the case to the district court, so that the would-be picketers could pursue any remaining claims. Plaintiffs neither amended their complaint nor offered…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Steffel v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Frisby v. SchultzSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Carey v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Sandra C. Schultz and Robert C. Braun v. Russell Frisby, George R. Hunt, Robert Wargowski, Harlan Ross, Clayton A. Cramer, and the Town of BrookfieldCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Gail Anderson v. Milwaukee County and Milwaukee Transport Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
  2. Veneklase v. City of FargoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
  3. Veneklase v. City of FargoDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 1995
  4. Independents Gas & Service Stations Ass'n v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
  5. Copper v. City of FargoDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API