Legal Opinion
United States v. Winchenbach
District Court, D. Maine
Decided October 27, 1998No. Criminal 98-38-P-CPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO SUPPRESS
GENE CARTER, District Judge.
Defendant Ralph Winchenbach, Jr. faces a charge of intentional distribution of a controlled substance containing cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. Indictment (Docket No. 1). Now before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Suppress (Docket No. 9). In that motion, Defendant asks this Court to suppress as evidence in this case any evidence obtained as a result of his arrest and as a result of a search of his person at the time of his arrest. After reviewing counsels’ memoranda,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. WinchenbachCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- FARRINGTON v. FAIRFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENTDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2024
- United States v. WinchenbachCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999