Legal Opinion

Portneuf-Marsh Valley Canal Co. v. Brown

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 6, 1927No. 252PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone

The question presented by this record is one of priority of liens upon shares of stock representing water rights in an irrigation project organized and created under the Act of Congress known as the Carey Act, August 18, 1894, c. 301, § 4, 28 Stat. 372, 422, as amended June 11, 1896, c. 420, 29 Stat. 413, 434, and under concurrent legislation of the State of Idaho, title 26, c. 136, § 2996, et seq. The present suit was begun in the district court for Idaho by respondents, citizens of Massachusetts, for the foreclosure of a deed of trust, of which they are trustees. The defendants are two…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Risty v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Continental & Commercial Trust & Savings Bank v. WernerIdaho Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Brown v. Portneuf-Marsh Valley Irr. Co.District Court, D. Idaho · 1924

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank of Alex v. Southland Production Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  2. Andrews v. North Side Canal Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1932
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. LevyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1935
  4. Valier Co. v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1950
  5. North Side Canal Co. v. Idaho Farms Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1939

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API