Legal Opinion

Brown v. Portneuf-Marsh Valley Irr. Co.

District Court, D. Idaho

Decided January 18, 1924No. 406PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIETRICH, District Judge.

The controversy grows out of the' Downey Carey Act irrigation project in Bannock county, Idaho. Primarily the question is whether or not assessments levied by a Carey Act operating company for the necessary expense of maintaining- and operating the system upon stock issued pursuant to contracts of sale to settlers purchasing water rights are valid as against and superior to the claim of the construction company and its assignees for deferred unpaid installments on account of the purchase price of the water rights, and, secondarily, whether or not, in view of certain…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Continental & Commercial Trust & Savings Bank v. WernerIdaho Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Hall v. Eagle Rock & Willow Creek Water Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Portneuf-Marsh Valley Canal Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Valier Co. v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Eagle Creek Irrigation Co. v. A.C. & C.E. Invs., Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Valier Co. v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API