Legal Opinion

Reed v. Home State Life Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 14, 1939No. 28974PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.

This is an action to recover under the double indemnity provision of a policy of life insurance.

Plaintiff below has appealed from an adverse judgment entered on sustaining demurrer to her petition.

According to the petition the policy was issued in 1930, and the insured was killed in a commercial aeroplane accident in 1937 while engaged as a copilot. The principal amount, or face, of the policy was immediately paid to plaintiff as beneficiary, but the defendant insurance company denied liability under the double indemnity feature.

Primarily, the policy is one of ordinary life in the face amount…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Matter of Met. Life Ins. Co. v. ConwayNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. GraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  3. United Security Life Insurance v. MasseySupreme Court of Virginia · 1932
  4. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. DyessSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Baum v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  2. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. RosierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  3. C. P. A. Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  4. Security Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. HollingsworthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
  5. Bankers Life Co. of Des Moines v. HortonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API