Legal Opinion
Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. Rosier
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 7, 1941No. 29483PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtOsborn, J.
Plaintiff, Gay N. Rosier, instituted this action against defendant, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, in the court of common pleas of Tulsa county. Plaintiff sought recovery of certain indemnity provided in a double indemnity feature of a life insurance policy, of which she was the beneficiary. Issues were joined, the cause was tried to a jury and a verdict was returned in favor of plaintiff. From a judgment thereon, defendant has appealed. The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court.
Plaintiff alleged that on June 11, 1924, defendant issued its insurance policy upon…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Watkins v. Prudential InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Home Benefit Assn. v. SargentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Whitlatch v. . Fidelity and Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. SiefkeNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Jefferson Standard Life Ins. Co. v. ClemmerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Boston Insurance Company v. SmithDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
- State Mutual Life Assurance Co. of America v. HamptonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Utilities Ins. Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
- Evans v. Continental Life and Accident CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
- Hume v. Standard Life and Accident Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.