Legal Opinion
Goben v. Barry
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided July 26, 1985No. 57,601PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Holmes, J.:
This is an appeal by Bernard L. Barry from further proceedings following remand after our decision in Goben v. Barry, 234 Kan. 721, 676 P.2d 90 (1984) (hereafter Goben J). The underlying facts are set forth in detail in Goben I and will not be repeated here.
Suffice it to say, we found in Goben I that Goben and Barry had entered into a joint venture for the purpose of dealing in the acquisition and development of oil and gas properties. We further found that Barry had breached his fiduciary duty to his fellow co-adventurer by ousting him from…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Alessi v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Raul Gonzales v. The City of PeoriaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Stone v. StoneDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1978
- Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. HammondCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Planned Consumer Marketing, Inc. v. Coats & Clark, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. American Red Ball Transit Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1997
- In Re Tax Appeal of ANR Pipeline Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1994
- Planned Consumer Marketing, Inc. v. Coats & Clark, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Kansas, Inc. v. Riverside HospitalSupreme Court of Kansas · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.