Legal Opinion

Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Kansas, Inc. v. Riverside Hospital

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 26, 1985No. 57,667PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

McFarland, J.:

This is a dispute between two employee health care group plans as to which plan has primary coverage and which plan has secondary coverage relative to certain medical expense claims.

BACKGROUND FACTS

The facts are not in dispute and may be summarized as follows. Leslie Stadalman is an employee of defendant Riverside Hospital and, as such, is a “covered person” under that institution’s employee health care plan. Leslie Stadalman is the wife of Gregory Stadalman. Mr. Stadalman is employed by the City of Wichita and is covered under his…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Northeast Department Ilgwu Health and Welfare Fund and Sol Hoffman v. Teamsters Local Union No. 229 Welfare FundCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  2. Harbor Insurance v. United Services Automobile Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  3. Blanchard v. RodrigueLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. Crestview Bowl, Inc. v. Womer Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1979
  5. Buckeye Union Insurance v. State Automobile Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Miss. v. LarsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Arkansas Poultry Federation Insurance Trust v. LawrenceCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1991
  3. H. Freeman & Son v. Henry's, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1986
  4. Continental Casualty Company v. Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance CompanyMississippi Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API