Legal Opinion
Marshall v. Randall
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided June 12, 2013No. 12-2479-cvPublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN M. WALKER, JR., Circuit Judge:
Defendants-Appellants Salim Randall and Michael Burbridge appeal from the 2012 judgment of liability of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Weinstein, Judge). After a jury trial, Defendants-Appellants were found liable for false arrest, malicious prosecution, and violation of Joshua Marshall’s right to a fair trial. They were ordered to pay damages of $95,000 each. We hold that there was no error in the district court’s trial rulings and affirm the judgment.
BACKGROUND
We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Zafiro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Briscoe v. LaHueSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rehberg v. PaulkSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Marc J. Anderson & Jeffrey E. Grubb v. Dennis Branen, Ross Kindestin, Ed WisniefskiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Village of Freeport v. BarrellaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
- Coggins v. BuonoraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- Stanczyk v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- Morales v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- Beck Chevrolet Co. v. General Motors LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.