Legal Opinion

Heitz v. County of Sacramento

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 22, 1978No. Civ. 17186Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

JANES, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of dismissal entered after the trial court sustained, without leave to amend, defendant County of Sacramento’s demurrer to his complaint for the recovery of damages for injuries resulting from a swine flu immunization received at a county-provided inocculation center. Plaintiff seeks reversal of the judgment on the ground that Government Code section 856.6, which exempts public and volunteer participants in the National Influenza Program of 1976 from liability except in the case of willful misconduct, is unconstitutional.

Plaintiff’s complaint,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Palermo v. Stockton Theatres, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1948
  2. In Re CreglerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Consolidated Theatres, Inc. v. Theatrical Stage Employees Union, Local 16California Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Heron v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Powers Farms, Inc. v. Consolidated Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API