Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Roe

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided June 3, 1959PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Joseph A. Cox, S.

The testatrix created a trust for the benefit of her husband in a principal amount equivalent to his intestate share with the trust remainder payable to a designated charity. The surviving husband renounced his interest in the estate within a reasonable time after the testatrix’ death. This was the husband’s privilege and the renunciation was effective (Albany Hosp. v. Albany Guardian Soc., 214 N. Y. 435; Matter of Suter, 207 Misc. 1002). Here we have none of the fact elements which existed in Matter of Wilson (298 N. Y. 398) and which caused the court in that case to hold a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Albany Hospital v. . Albany Guardian SocietyNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. Matter of KohlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  3. In Re the Accounting of WilsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  4. In re the Estate of HannaNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
  5. In re the Estate of MatthiessenNew York Surrogate's Court · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Im re the Estate of CarsonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1968
  2. In re the Estate of PaineNew York Surrogate's Court · 1980
  3. In re the Estate of DevlinNew York Surrogate's Court · 1964
  4. In re the Estate of GrochockiNew York Surrogate's Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API