Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Matthiessen
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided December 6, 1940PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Taylor, S.
Conrad Henry Matthiessen’s will was admitted to probate in this court and letters testamentary granted to the accountant. The decedent left him surviving his wife and three sons, all of whom are living. These sons are married and have children who are contingent remaindermen under the will and interested in this proceeding. Some of the grandchildren are minors and they are represented here by the special guardian.
By clause “ third ” the decedent gave to his wife, Eda Matthiessen, “ all of my personal property and effects other than bonds, stocks, notes and other securities and…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Wright v. . WrightNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Matter of DurandNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Oliver v. WellsNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Albany Hospital v. . Albany Guardian SocietyNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Lamb v. . LambNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Bergan v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1943
- Estate of Genevieve Rolin, Deceased, Haydee Rolin and Marine Midland Bank New York, Executors v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Estate of Dreyer v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1977
- In re the Construction of the Will of SuterNew York Surrogate's Court · 1955
- In re the Estate of WolffNew York Surrogate's Court · 1957
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.