Legal Opinion

Keller v. Crase

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 7, 1989No. 64327PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

HARGRAVE, Chief Justice.

The issue presented herein is the same as that in Jarchow v. Eder, 433 P.2d 942 (Okl.1967), with the factual difference that, in the case at bar, the defendant at all times remained in the state of Oklahoma, and is alleged by plaintiff to have concealed himself therein to avoid service of process. In Jarchow, supra, the issue was whether Title 12 O.S.1961 § 98, which would otherwise have tolled the two-year statute of limitations in 12 O.S.1961 § 95(3), was rendered inapplicable by the availability of substituted service of process upon the defendant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lowder v. Oklahoma Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
  2. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. TaliaferroSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. Wright v. KeiserSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
  4. Jarchow v. EderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  5. McCullough v. BoydSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Miller v. David Grace, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
  2. Eddie Medina, Jr. v. Gloria Tate D/B/A Humble Family Skate Center and Humble Family Skate Center, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2013
  3. Eddie Medina, Jr. v. Gloria Tate D/B/A Humble Family Skate Center and Humble Family Skate Center, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2013
  4. Miller v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API