Legal Opinion

Wright v. Keiser

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 14, 1977No. 48721PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMMS, Justice.

Plaintiffs, the Wrights, seek reversal of the trial court’s sustention of defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing their action as barred by the statute of limitations. For convenience the parties will be referred to by their designation in the trial court.

The essential facts are few and undisputed. Plaintiffs, driver and passengers of one automobile, were involved in a collision with an automobile driven by defendant, Linda Reiser, on August 7,1972, in Oklahoma City. When the accident occurred and the cause of action accrued, defendant was a resident of Oklahoma.…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Dunn v. BlumsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Sosna v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Skinner v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. WilliamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  5. Harper v. Virginia Board of ElectionsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State of Minn. Ex Rel. Hove v. DoeseSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Mead Corp. v. Allendale Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1979
  3. Industrial Consultants, Inc. v. H. S. Equities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
  4. Waller v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 1990
  5. Gordon v. GordonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API