Brennan v. Concord EFS, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
WALKER, Chief Judge.
In this putative class action, -plaintiffs assert that defendants — banks and other entities involved in the processing of withdrawals from automated teller machines (ATMs) in the “Star” ATM network (“Star”) — have engaged in horizontal price fixing declared illegal by section 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act, 15 USC § 1. Plaintiffs argue that defendants’ conduct is condemned per se; they disclaim any intention of proceeding on a rule of reason theory. Several defendants move to dismiss the complaint (or for judgment on the pleadings) on the ground that Star is a…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination UnitSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Lee v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United Food & Commercial Workers Local 1776 v. Teikoku Pharma USA, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Lopez-Reyes v. Kenosian & Miele, LLPDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2007
- In Re ATM Fee Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2008
- Prestige Pet Products, Inc. v. Pingyang Huaxing Leather & Plastic Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2011
- In Re Atm Fee Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.