Legal Opinion

Schlueter v. City of Maryland Heights

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 3, 1997No. 70925PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Linda Schlueter, and Dennis and Latisha Hull, husband and wife, (collectively “parents”) appeal from a grant of summary judgment entered in favor of the City of Maryland Heights (“City”). The issue on appeal is whether City owed parents’ sons a duty to protect them from crashing their cars into trees located a few feet from the traveled portion of a roadway. We find no error in that City owed parents’ sons no duty to remove or barricade the alleged dangerous condition located off the traveled portion of the roadway. We affirm.

The material facts are not in dispute. On October 5, 1991, Robert…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. Clinkenbeard v. City of St. JosephSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
  3. General Motors Corp. v. City of Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Rothwell v. West Central Electric Cooperative, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Williams v. City of IndependenceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Peck v. Alliance General InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Smith v. HammonsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Martin v. Missouri Highway & Transportation DepartmentMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. J.H. Berra Paving Co. v. City of EurekaMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API