Legal Opinion

General Motors Corp. v. City of Kansas City

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 10, 1995No. WD 46246, WD 46526PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRECKENRIDGE, Judge.

General Motors Corporation (GM) appeals from the trial court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the City of Kansas City (City) on GM’s claims seeking recovery of occupation license taxes which GM alleges were illegally assessed by Kansas City against GM. GM raises five points on appeal arguing that the trial court erred in granting the City summary judgment in that: the City’s occupation license tax, on its face and as applied, violates the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution; the occupation license tax violates Missouri ease law and the uniformity clause…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. Zafft v. Eli Lilly & Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  3. John Calvin Manor, Inc. v. AylwardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
  4. B & D Inv. Co., Inc. v. SchneiderSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  5. Armco Steel v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Chaney v. CooperMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Lett v. City of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Williams v. City of IndependenceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Hockensmith v. BrownMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. State Ex Rel. Webb v. Hartford Casualty Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1998

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API